Some new leaks tease that AMD's super-beefed Ryzen Threadripper PRO series will have support for up to 64 cores and 128 threads at up to 4.2GHz, 128 PCIe 4.0 lanes (!!!), a 280W TDP, and 8-channel ...
We knew that AMD was preparing to launch its new Ryzen Threadripper PRO processors in March 2021, but now we have some solid pricing on the flagship Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX chip that will cost ...
AMD is prepping a new workstation CPU and platform. The 3995WX Threadripper Pro will bring 8-channel memory to the company's 64-core, ultra-high-end desktop CPU. Share on Facebook (opens in a new ...
AMD launched its 64C/128T, 7nm Ryzen Threadripper 3990X back in November last year, and it currently sits at the top of the Threadripper 3000 product stack. The processor was heralded as the world's ...
AMD Threadripper Pro CPUs are coming to take down Intel’s Xeon workstation chips, offering up to 64 cores, 128 threads, 128 lanes of PCIe Gen 4, and up to 2TB of RAM. All four chips feature the same ...
CAM software needs to run on professional workstations powered by the right processors. An AMD Ryzen<sup>TM</sup>Threadripper<sup>TM</sup> PRO 3995WX processor with 64 cores is perfectly suited for ...
There have been rumors for more than a few months now that AMD was considering the launch of a new ‘Pro’ range of Threadripper processors. To date, however, the news has largely been restricted to ...
AMD’s Threadripper Pro series was meant to be a competitor to Intel’s Xeon line of workstation chips. While the Threadripper Pro 3995WX certainly was a force to reckoned with, its successor looks to ...
Three of the fastest workstation CPUs on Earth slug it out in an AI-powered transcoding benchmark we designed to scale from dual-core to 64-core systems. Share on Facebook (opens in a new window) ...
AMD has offered “PRO” branded Ryzen processors for a number of years. Although the base processor architecture and platform is unchanged versus their standard counterparts, Pro series Ryzen processors ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback