Unwaveringly bleak, “The Hunger Games: Mockingjay, Part 2” is the culmination of the action-packed, stirring “Hunger Games” series that fans deserved. As a result of director Francis Lawrence’s work, ...
“Mockingjay — Part 1,” despite some inspirational scenes, is a slow and brooding excuse for a movie. On the rebound, “Mockingjay — Part 2” runs a long two hours and 17 minutes, but it offers extended, ...
Jennifer Lawrence’s strong performance as Katniss Everdeen remains the highlight in the third installment of the “Hunger Games.” Turning a trilogy into a movie is never easy to pull off, but splitting ...
Audiences got pissy about last year’s Mockingjay – Part 1, the third film in the Hunger Games franchise. They rightly felt gamed by a blatant cash grab that took the last book in Suzanne Collins’ ...
“The Hunger Games: Mockingjay — Part 1” bides its time. In doing so, the film diminishes the impact of its heroine, Katniss Everdeen, and mutes the urgency in Suzanne Collins’ futuristic “Hunger Games ...
“The Hunger Games: Mockingjay — Part 1” bides its time. In doing so, the film diminishes the impact of its heroine, Katniss Everdeen, and mutes the urgency in Suzanne Collins’ futuristic “Hunger Games ...
LOS ANGELES – All is not well in Panem. At the conclusion of “The Hunger Games: Catching Fire,” Katniss’ (Jennifer Lawrence) force-field shattering arrow left the society in turmoil. The desperate act ...
It's pretty clear that at this Katniss and Peeta are now being used for propaganda, as a marketing scheme to further the cause or deflate the rebellion as they are used as leverage against each other.
The hype for “The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 1,” the third of four movies based on the best-selling book series, has been off the charts. Many fans of the books by Suzanne Collins have been dying ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback