Fears of militarising AI run deep at the two model-makers. At least until recently, both had safeguards against using AI to make weapons (the DOW has demanded that these be scrapped). The pair are also alert to the risk of losing their brainy AI researchers, many of whom come from abroad and may not share the Trump administration’s ideology.

Sam Altman has made some bombshell revelations about the power of AI at the AI Impact Summit 2026. He spoke of superintelligence or AI agents operating out of powerful data centers that could even render the most intelligent tech entrepreneurs of our generation redundant.

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei is meeting with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth today, as the Pentagon threatens the AI company with what could amount to a government blacklist.

Over the past couple of months, several researchers have begun making the same provocative claim: They used generative-AI tools to solve a previously unanswered math problem. The most extreme promises—AI-assisted resolutions to some of the hardest problems in mathematics—may well turn out to be empty hype.

The novelty of AI is wearing off in the enterprise landscape, and organizations are rightfully focused now on AI driving results.

Top United States artificial intelligence firm Anthropic is accusing three prominent Chinese AI labs of illegally extracting capabilities from its Claude model to advance their own, claiming it raises national security concerns.

When asked to recommend a physician, urgent care center, or hospital system, AI models don’t rely on a single “best” source. Instead, they aggregate and compare signals across the web, giving more weight to consistency, corroboration, and verified information than to persuasive messaging or unique content.

All of us will profit if we ensure AI training data is licensed, and writers, musicians and artists will continue to have a livelihood.